Human Life Amendment

The Republicans want to ban abortion. This is from a draft of the proposal posted on Yahoo! News “The Ticket”.

“..the GOP will voice its support for a “human life amendment” to the Constitution.

“Faithful to the ‘self-evident’ truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed,” the draft platform states. “We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.”

This is Section 1 of the 14th Amendment – I’ve bolded for emphasis: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The amendment makes clear BORN or NATURALIZED – therefore it is not “self evident” that this would apply to the unborn. In fact unborn is the direct opposite of born. Furthermore, Stand Your Ground and Stop & Frisk DIRECTLY go against your 14th amendment rights. However, most people who come across these tactics cannot afford a lawyer that has enough care/time to fight their case based on this constitutional infringement of rights.

Just wanted to point this out there… notjustmythoughts

OF COURSE they wouldn’t

Have you read the news today – The NY Daily News, The NY Post, or The NY Times specifically? I ask because there is an article in each of these, which I’ve linked the Daily News article, (NY Daily News: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/brooklyn/ups-drivers-caught-delivering-30-pounds-marijuana-article-1.1138992) regarding 3 men who were arrested in a Marijuana bust. 30lbs of Marijuana to be exact. These men were all in their 50s. Other than their age and where they live characteristics of the men are not given. Therein lies my issue.

I have an issue with race not being noted in this article. Truthfully, I don’t really care what color or ethnic background a person is if they commit a crime. BUT the media LOVES to let us know when an individual is Black or Brown when they commit crimes – drug crimes or (and maybe especially) violent crimes. No where in this article is there a mention of race. Because of this my natural reaction is to assume they are not minorities. If they were, the article would read something like:

3 Black men were arrested in a cartel attempt of drug smuggling through celebrated shipping company UPS.

It’s just another way to downplay “their” presence in the drug game and criminal world while touting us as criminals and violent and prone to animalistic behaviors.

notjustmythoughts

Newspaper scale-back

http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/05/new_orleans_becomes_largest_us_city_without_daily_newspaper_36_residents_without_internet.html

I’ve been meaning to post this for some time now.

Basically, a major city is scaling back its printed newspapers and are only reporting online. Now, this bothers me. Forget that this city is largely composed of minorities with a large portion being poor. Let’s forget that (though, I really have not forgotten this at all and is the whole premise of me wanting to write about it). I ask you to forget this fact not because it is unimportant, but because in this case it shouldn’t be a color thing. This is a thing of news and important media not being easily accessible to ALL residents of a community. This is a problem because there is a large portion of the community who are poor. Most people’s perception of others is closely linked with how they view society from their world. In most people’s world/mind – people are online, tech savvy, have the internet and computer at home, are online reading the news, or have a Kindle/iPad/tablet and read the NY Times on their way to work. The unemployment rate is getting better for everyone and those that aren’t getting jobs aren’t getting them because they aren’t trying… BIG FAT NEGATIVE. 

There is still a good portion of the population without access to a computer or internet at home. There are still people without smart phones (though that number is diminishing). There are people who rely on printed news for their information in the community, nation, world, etc. Without a printed version of news, how would these people get important information? A library perhaps. Well, maybe, but from my neighborhood alone I can tell you – we have one library. They do not get printed newspapers anymore and they only allow you computer access once daily for 30 minutes. They are open odd times – times that I cannot keep track of because they are continually being cut.

This is injustice at its finest… who knew we news was a privilege…

notjustmythoughts