KONY 2012

Join the cause. If you have never stood for anything now is your chance to take an important stand. History is YOURstory to make.

www.kony2012.com
To buy action kit/bracelets: http://invisiblechildrenstore.myshopify.com/
To make a donation: http://bit.ly/yp5Ffv
To sign the pledge: http://www.causes.com/causes/227-invisible-children
To watch the film: http://vimeo.com/37119711

I look forward to seeing you there.

notjustmythoughts

Ain’t this some sh*t

Colorlines.com never fails me… please check this artilce out. It is worth the read. Essentially this is another day in the life of systematic racism in the form of government policy… think, Jim Crow. It seems he’s been resurrected (and not just in the incarcerated sense like the 2010 book THE NEW JIM CROW, by Michelle Alexander)…
http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/03/voter_id_card.html

I just don’t understand (although sadly I do) how this can happen in 2012….

notjustmythoughts

Disparate Impact: Black Lawmakers and Ethics Investigations

Is anyone surprised by this? As you may have guessed, there was no shock value in the article for me because… It is as I believe them to be, systematic racism and discrimination…

check out the article from theatlantic.com… http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/03/disparate-impact-black-lawmakers-and-ethics-investigations/253931/

notjustmythoughts

Systematic Racism and Discrimination

Below is a link to an article I found on Blackdoctor.org. This seems a fitting post when looking at my previous post yesterday. The article is about mental health and how there is little information in regards to mental health treatment and best practices in black communities.

In the article Dr. Carl Bell (CEO and president of the Community Health Council and director of the Institute for Juvenile Research at the University of Illinois in Chicago) says, “It’s really hard getting mental health services in black communities.These services are a scarcity, because there is no consideration for poor people with mental illnesses…Bell says there is little to no research on how to properly treat blacks suffering from schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, drug and substance abuse, and other mental illnesses, mainly because no one has devoted time to understanding the social and cultural issues affecting poor black communities.”

I’ve bolded for emphasis on what stood out to me. Last night I went to my mother’s house for dinner. I was talking about my beliefs in systematic racism and policy, to which she just nodded. Her boyfriend on the other hand laughed. His beliefs and perceptions are polar opposite to mine. But for those that don’t believe, all they have to do it look (which I said to him).

The policies of health and healthcare that affects minorities and underprivileged communities are continuously cut or not even given thought. The communities are under represented in the government and their voices are often not heard. Sadly, many times they don’t even speak up. I know many people might say, that is exactly the problem. But that’s not entirely true. There are scholars and doctors and numerous people who are fighting for these rights and yet they too are unheard. If they (the “respected”) aren’t even heard how are the “lowest” on the totem pole going to be heard? And so, many don’t try. This too I can understand… sometimes after trying and trying and failing and failing there comes a point where there is no fight left in a person. For all of those that feel defeated I am speaking up. THIS MUST CHANGE!

This systematic racism and discrimination MUST stop. The purposeful actions of harm by those with the clout to change discriminatory policies must stop. I read in an unrelated book (Hip Hop Wars by Tricia Rose) a very powerful statement, “profit over people”. This idea of profit over people and rights of ALL people must stop.

What is democracy when only some people have it?
notjustmythoughts

Article on blackdoctor.org: http://blackdoctor.org/news/article/Mental_Health/Why_Black_America_s_Battle_With_Mental_Health_Is_Failing.aspx

UPDATE: this got me thinking… a few years ago someone I know stabbed a 9 year old boy to death over a video game. This person was in and out of the mental health clinics in NYC from a young child. Due to the lack of care in the community, he was continuously released. He is now in prison for committing murder. Prison, he should not be. I don’t believe he should be “free” either (I’ve used quotes around free because truthfully, was he ever free? His whole life he was burdened with mental conflict and instability and the country that promotes freedom and equality failed him by not allowing him proper care). But [instead of prison] he should be in an institution tending to his illness rather than caged. People believe he is a monster and I’ll leave you to your opinions. I have my own and while I don’t think he was right, not by any means, this person is a sick individual and should not have been in a situation to harm anyone. He should have been given a chance at life BEFORE this incident by recieving the mental help he needed and deserved. He is the one punished, when the community and government failed him (and the family he harmed). Where is their [those that cut funding and don’t even care about the mental health in poor communities] punishment?

notjustmythoughts

Welcome to Life?

An exerpt from the article on: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/27/michelle-ugenti-arizona-rep-justifies-tuition-hike_n_1304731.html

“An Arizona House committee passed a bill last week that would require every student at a public college in the state, regardless of economic status, to pay a minimum of $2,000 in tuition.
As Think Progress noted, nearly 100 Arizona students attended the committee hearing to speak out against the bill, HB 2675, expressing concern that it would make it more difficult for many students to afford college. Rep. Michelle Ugenti (R-Scottsdale) responded bluntly in favor of the new measure: ‘Welcome to life.’

I read this article a day after reading an article in TIME Magazine’s latest issue regarding Latinos (in Arizona) potentially “electing” president. (proper sourcing to come) In this article TIME was detailing the potential force behind the Latino vote and this potential is greatest in states like Arizona. Arizona is largely a Republican State with an abundance in the Latino population. The population of Latinos here feel they are Republicans on paper but that the Republicans don’t want them (their vote) and that they aren’t Democrats on paper, but that the Democrats do want them (this is a paraphrase of a statement by a Latino community member in Arizona).

Now, I’m not a political person. I vote yes. I believe it is important. If I want to voice my opinions well I better cast my ballot vote… so of course I follow things going on politically, but I don’t consider myself to be a largely political person. (Though I admit from my blog people often consider me political. But to me, this is just human nature. It goes beyond politics… it’s.. well this is something that should be ingrained in every human…I talk about things that are rights and equality based and that shouldn’t be political. It shouldn’t be up to a Republican or Democrat…it should…well it should just be.)

I digressed… now after reading the article in TIME and reading the article from Huffington Post I think to myself… well isn’t this pushing the Latino voter further to the fringes? The statement, “welcome to life” was made by a Republican representative. These are the sort of things that push people away. I won’t openly admit if I am Democratic or Republican because to be honest I don’t believe I fit neatly into either box. The vote should be based on who is the better person for the job, not necessarily by party. BUT what I will say is, if the Republicans are out-casting a HUGE number of voters it sure doesn’t look good for them.

Furthermore, on the equality side…really, welcome to life? Who says that, besides a mother to a child? The fact of the matter is $2000 a semester is unaffordable for some people and yet people believe there is equal opportunity for everyone. What gets me is, sure the opportunity is there, but how could it be equal when it’s out of the reach of many people?

notjustmythoughts.

A threat or worthy of trust?

First, let me say I apologize for my lack of blogging. Life seems to get away from you at times…

Now, on to the meat of it. I was reading the NY Daily News online and came across an article “White grandfather stopped and cuffed for walking home with his black granddaughter” and I just couldn’t believe it. Well now of course that isn’t entirely true. I definitely believe it, but I guess it’s more that I don’t want to believe it. People often tell me that racial prejudices don’t exist and that I make it out to be more than it really is, but you know I just don’t buy that. And if I wanted proof, well here it is in the most simpliest form. A black girl and a white man together rings alarms in the minds of so many people. Allegedly there was a kidnapping of a black girl by a white man, but when you read, it seems more like there were reports of people spotting a white man who [must have] kidnapped a black girl. So for me, this seems more like they saw him and his granddaughter and thought, well they can’t possibily be together… or related… there must be something wrong here.

The saddest part of it all isn’t the racism they were faced with (though that is of great sadness), but what kind of impression of police that encounter will leave on the little girl. There was no apology, there was no kindness, there was only aggression and police. Those two often go hand in hand, but at 5 you should be faced with positive images of police, not that of threat and racism.

Check out the article: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/white-grandfather-stopped-cuffed-walking-home-black-grandaughter-article-1.1021896 

notjustmythougths

Cross-ownership Ban

Still on the subject of Fighting for Air: The Battle to Control America’s Media by Eric Klinenberg

Dating back to 1975 the FCC had a cross-ownership ban in place that stated that one entity could not own cross own broadcast and newspaper companies in the same market. In 2000, the FCC revisited this ban. It was determined that if the ban were lifted the American people would suffer because there would be a lack of view point diversity. (This lack of diversity began to take hold of radio with the Telecommunications Act in 1996). The Tribune Company fought this with (as you may guess) MONEY. It went on a spending spree for lobbyist from 2000 to 2003. They tripled their spending during this time. It worked. in 2003 the ban was lifted to such a degree that one company could own 45% of a NATIONAL audience. (press release from 2003 http://money.cnn.com/2003/06/02/news/companies/fcc_rules/ )

Fortunately, to some degree, this was revisited in 2011 and Federal Courts urged the FCC to old cross-ownership ban. The some degree lies in the fact that even though changes were made the damage had already been done. Companies that seized the opportunity and gobbled up markets were “grandfathered in” and allowed to stay as one entity. (link to article regarding the courts and FCC http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/3rd-circuit-tells-fcc-to-rewrite-media-ownership-rules).

The FCC failed Americans in those (approx) 8 years. There is no turning back from the media conglomerates created during the years the ban was lifted. My question is, how is the being “grandfathered in” allowed to happen? The South had tried this with limiting Black votes with the Grandfather Clause. Is it just me that believes they are one in the same?

notjustmythoughts

1996 Telecommunications Act

Thanks to an old professor of mine I was introduced to a GREAT book, Fighting for Air: The Battle to Control America’s Media by Eric Klinenberg.

I do suggest you all to check out the book just because I think it is worth the knowledge.

Anyway, one specific thing I’d like to bring up is the 1996 Telecommunications Act which opened up the flood gates to American Radio. Prior to the signing of this Act, there were greater restrictions of how many stations of broadcast (and the level of their frequency) could be owned by one person/corporations. In the releasing of these restrictions companies bought up the air waves thus creating an atmosphere where competition was limited and insights shared.

What this means? Well if one company owns 1000 stations across the U.S in both large and small markets with high frequency reach, these 1000 stations will share one common mindset… the owners’. There will be limited perspecitives on a topic and a great deal of bias with the type of information released by the stations… In a simplier way: our media is being controlled in a manner similar to a straight jacket.

Is anyone else upset by this? The implications are vast.

The Other Wes Moore

It’s been a little longer than I would have liked to write this post, but I had to finish this book in its entirety as well as develop my thoughts. The book: The Other Wes Moore One Name, Two Fates by Wes Moore was an incredible tale. To generalize (which is not giving the book the credit it deserves) would be to simply say that this is a memoir of sorts about two men each named Wes Moore. While that is true it is much deeper than the surface of their lives.

I highly recommend this book to everyone – teachers, students, adults, professors. I believe everyone can gain a little knowledge about themselves and the society around them. As you may have already established, I am passionate in my views regarding the disparities of society surrounding race and economics. In the telling of the lives of each Wes Moore I found so many of the things I felt about society come alive in their life stories. Wes Moore presents the book in chapters with two sections to every chapter – his story and Wes’ story. The side by side portrayal allows the differences in their lives (and possibly their fates) to come alive and the disparities glare at you with unapologetic reality.

One thing that remains with me is a question Wes Moore poses to the imprisoned Wes and Wes’ response. The question is in the introductory section of Part III of the book “Paths Taken and Expectations Fulfilled.” Each part has an introductory section, which is an excerpt from an interview conducted at the prison by Wes. Wes asks, “Do you think we’re all just products of our environments?” The imprisoned Wes answers, “I think so, or maybe products of our expectations.” Wes elaborates on his point saying, “… others’ expectations that you take on as your own.”

I keep thinking about this. Mainly because I am one of those people that believe you are a product of your environment – both the environment inside and outside of your home. But I also think about this because I believe there is validity in the statement. For those that have succeeded, most have done so because they have had people rooting for them – believing in them. They have had mentors or family and friends that believe their success is probable. There are exceptions to this of course – where people want to prove others wrong and show them in spite of the lack of support and belief in them they will succeed. But those exceptions are not what kept this in my mind.

I haven’t always had the easiest life. I was fortunate to have a two family household – so people tell me, but my parents fought constantly. To my mother’s heartbreak in my adulthood I shared a sad truth, I do not have one happy memory with both my parents in it. My happiest moments of my childhood are with my friends, my grandmother, or my parents separately. They eventually separated, when I was 14 and going to high school. My mother lost a husband. I lost a father. I moved in with my grandparents. Even with the instability at home one thing that remained constant was the push from my mother to do well in school. She always told me I could be anything I wanted to be in life and to let nothing stop me from true success. My teachers, in the private school my parents could hardly afford, instilled this same belief – I could be anything. Enough people told me this that I believed and sought out this expectation of me.

The imprisoned Wes Moore was never told those things. His criminal brother Tony did tell him to stay in school, but when you’re in and out of prison and your actions aren’t positive those words hold no meaning. His mother simply asked him not to be like Tony, but never gave him guidance on what he could be. I am not placing blame on his mother… she too was a product of this same reality. The low expectations society places on certain people (the economically repressed and forced urban dwellers) become instead [of positivity] what is ingrained in the budding minds of the youth.

Wes writes, in a section about his life, “‘Justin, you are a good kid, you need to stay away from Wes or you will end up going nowhere like he will.’ Justin simply shook his head and ignored him. It amazed Justin how easily they would write off a twelve-year-old.” This quote details an interaction between Justin (Wes’ best friend) and a teacher. At twelve-years old teachers had a remarkably low expectation of Wes. Fortunately his fate provided strong mentors and people who believed in his success. His mother was always a stronghold in this belief.

And so it makes me wonder, are we the products of our expectations?

Please read the book, you will more than love it. You will be inspired. http://theotherwesmoore.com/

Thank you Wes Moore for sharing your story as well as Wes’.

notjustmythoughts

“Illegals” Pt 2

And so the (mis)treatment continues…

While the president considers having a foriegn leader come into our country for care…this is what happens to those already here.

http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/01/immigrant_whos_disabled_after_work_accident_dies_after_deportation.html

Please read this article from colorlines.

notjustmythoughts