Sleeping on the job

This morning as I walked to work I saw a police officer asleep in his patrol car. I work in the heart of Times Square. Every morning there are a dozens of officers, mostly standing around chatting amongst themselves. Some direct tourists to the different attractions. This morning, one officer head back mouth gaped open was stone cold asleep. They are supposed to patrol, keep guard, and make sure everything is safe to protect and serve. I don’t get to sleep on the job and my role is not nearly as important as ensuring the safety of millions of New Yorkers and tourists that pass through the streets of Times Square. 

I’m not surprised this happened. If I had asked another officer, he would’ve told me something along the lines of “he worked a double” or “our job is really arduous.” But really, while this officer was literally asleep many others figuratively sleep on the job. 

What I mean? Look around you, open the papers, think about your own experiences with a New York police officer there are many occasions where they’ve been “sleeping” on their duties. 

It seems long ago they’ve forgotten to protect. They’ve forgotten how to serve. Well no, they know how to protect and serve their own. But why isn’t “their own” the people of the city? We are their employers, if you think about it technically. I pay my taxes, which in part, go to their salaries, their resources – them. I don’t feel protected. Have you ever been stopped? I have. I was nervous, afraid, cautious. I was unsure how this situation might play out. I wasn’t armed, but they were and it seemed that they walked to me with their right hip protruding. Saying, I have this [gun]. I have the power. You – you must obey. 

I was pulled over one time for making a left turn in an intersection where it was prohibited. I hadn’t realized. I’m familiar with the neighborhood, but it wasn’t my own and I hadn’t noticed. A police van was behind me. I had my signal. He waited behind me until I found the right moment to make my turn. He turned with me. I got pulled over. I of course received a ticket. Before that however, I asked why had I been pulled over. When he told me, I said, you couldn’t flash your lights? You couldn’t go over the speaker and tell me to keep moving? I fought the ticket and won. Sure I committed the “crime” but I felt even in the simplest of instances your job is to protect me. Turns aren’t allowed at certain intersections because of the volume of traffic making it a difficult and often dangerous place. He allowed me to turn in danger. He didn’t protect. I beat the ticket. He failed to do his job. 

That’s a very minor example. We all know, hear, read the stories about an officer shooting an innocent victim often times in an aggressive manner. 

They always seem to be sleeping on their job. To protect and serve, but who?

notjustmythoughts

Quietly done

So, I’m a little late in the game (don’t know how I missed this one), but it was recently brought to my attention that STD funding was drastically cut in NYC (the state and other states as well.) The first link I’ve provided is from an article in the Daily News Sept 2011. The second link I’ve provided is from an article on stdtestexpress.com posted Feb 2012. This article pertains to Illinois, but I believe the implications and correlations of budget cuts to STD testing in IL can be used directionally when looking at other states (like NY) that have cut STD funding. Before I even read the article about IL or even researched the information, I thought to myself, what the ****!!! It seems to me that the most important resources a state and city can offer are the first to be cut (public education/free healthcare). I can understand that free STD testing can become a huge expense and burden on a city and state budget, but it is the JOB of the government to protect those that cannot protect themselves and in this case that relates to STD testing. Many clinics (I have found due to calling 311, the department of health, and about 25 clinics in the 5 boroughs) offer SOME free testing and all still offer HIV testing. This is good and all, but some is quite frankly not good enough. I also thought to myself, well if it isn’t free, what does this mean for people who can’t afford the “low-cost” of testing? As we know, “low-cost” (and really anything pertaining to money and spending) is relative. What is low-cost to me, might not be affordable to you. This makes me wonder what this will do to the rise of STDs in NYC (and other places who suffered similar cuts). If IL is any indication of what is to come, seems like we will have a lot more people running around in oblivion to their STD status…

In short, the disparity in income inequality continues…

 notjustmythoughts

http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-09-06/local/30143550_1_std-cases-chlamydia-or-gonorrhea-rapid-hiv-testing

http://www.stdtestexpress.com/std-news/county-cuts-programs-and-watches-std-rates-rise-800706866/